Delicate Arch by Florian Schultz ~ taken with the Nikon D600 @ ISO 3200 |
Nikon D600 |
Canon EOS 6D |
Nikon D600 Sensor is Comparable to the D800: The Nikon D600 has a new 24.3-megapixel FX-format CMOS sensor. Nikon says the camera's 14-bit A/D conversion and excellent signal-to-noise ratio enable it to produce images with low noise and wide dynamic range even at high ISO sensitivities. The D600 offers an ISO range of 100–6400, extendable up to 25,600. Recent tests by DXO Labs rate the Nikon D600's sensor higher than the Nikon D3X, Nikon D4, Canon EOS 5D Mark III, and only slightly less than the Nikon D800! It will be interesting to see how well the Canon EOS 6D performs in these same tests after its release in December. (I agree with DxO's conclusion about the D600's sensor performing just slightly below the D800, but I'm not sure I agree that both sensors perform better than the Canon 5D Mark III. This leads me to the belief that the Canon 6D sensor may actually perform better than the Nikon D600 when all the tests are in (see below)).
This shows cropped detail of the top photo (click for an enlargement at 100%) |
Nikon D600 VIDEO: Photographer, Florian Schultz, and his brother, share their experiences of testing the new Nikon D600 in a video called, "Chasing the Light" --shot entirely with the D600. Be sure to also see, "The Making of Chasing the Light" --two brothers on a road trip, in an old pick-up truck! (I was intrigued to learn that the D600 has a built-in intervalometer, and also has the ability to preview time lapse shots as a video sequence!)
Nikon D600 Preview: For the best hands-on preview go to this Digital Photograpy Review.
Canon EOS 6D Preview: Because the 6D will not be released until December, there is little information available about it at the moment. For the best hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 6D, with key specs compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D600, go to this Digital Photograpy Review.
Lens Compatibility: If you are currently using a Canon camera with an APS-C size sensor and LF-S lenses, you'll also have to upgrade to LF lenses, since the LF-S lenses do not provide full-frame sensor coverage. However, the Nikon D600 FX-format camera does offers support for the complete DX NIKKOR lens lineup (with DX lenses, the camera automatically switches to a 10.5MP DX-format crop mode). One must use FX NIKKOR lenses to take advantage of the camera's full 24.3-million pixels.
My Opinion: Overall, there are several specification on the Nikon side that out-weigh the Canon specs. However, this blog is about night photography and the benefits of low noise at high ISO's. I think either camera is going to be a smash hit for photographers wanting the higher dynamic range and lower noise of a full-frame sensor. Although the Nikon is the first entry-level full-frame camera out of the gate and with a lot of hype, I think time may show that the image quality of the Canon EOS 6D to be superior at higher ISO's. There are at least two factors that lead me to this belief:
Number One: The default standard ISO range on the Nikon D600 is 100 to 6400, whereas the Canon EOS 6D has a standard ISO range of 100 to 25600, which is two stops greater. This would indicate that the Canon has superior noise control and a higher real life dynamic range.
Number Two: Tests from other sources lead me to believe that the DxOMark Sensor Scores may not be totally reliable (as several others have commented on the DxO website). For instance, they give an overall sensor score of 94 to the Nikon D600, just one point below the Nikon D800's score of 95; and they give the Canon EOS 5D Mark III a dismal score of 81, just two points above the older Mark II's score of 79.
Test pattern at Digital Photography Review (I choose the "BA" area from the bottle of Baileys liquor) |
Choose any 3 cameras you want to compare. I chose these and an ISO of 6400 (top left is the ISO 100 control) |
CAMERA FILE PIXEL SIZE UNCOMPRESSED / COMPRESSED COMPRESSION RATIO
Canon 5D Mk3 file: 5760 x 3840 pixels = 63.28MB / 8.4MB JPEG = 7.53:1 compression
Nikon D800 file: 7360 x 4912 pixels = 103.43MB / 18.8MB JPEG = 5.50:1 compression
Nikon D600 file: 6016 x 4016 pixels = 69.12MB / 14.5MB JPEG = 4.77:1 compression
I'm a bit puzzled as to why you would want to do a comparison of the D600 and the 6D here. Why not just write about your experience with the D600 now and then when the 6D comes out your experience with that.
ReplyDeleteMy only real conclusion from reading your article is that you are a Canon owner and want the 6D to be better (although you don't state this anywhere).
Incidentally, I followed your link from Ming Thein's website. I'm neither a candidate for the D600 or 6D, but I do like to read about photography (I have a D700 and a 5D2 but have pretty much given up on DSLRs).
I don't see how you can come to any conclusion about the sensor of the camera if you take only processed data (i.e. JPEG, compressed motion picture material) into consideration. There are more variables that dictate the size of a JPEG but noise.
ReplyDeleteAlso, if you look at the RAW DPR comparometer shots at ISO 6400 it becomes apparent that the D600 is better than the 5D3 (by a tiny bit) and the D800, at pixel level, appears a tiny bit worse than the D600, however the resolution of the D800 is of course higher and normalized to the image size of the D600 I expect the D800 to be slightly ahead.
Based on this data I can't really follow your argument.
I don't think too that JPEG sizes can be used for accessing noise levels between cameras.
ReplyDeleteFor example it could be that different cameras have different JPEG quality associated with the JPEG-Fine in-camera setting. As a evidence - 5D3's jpeg is "cleaner" at iso 100 with 7.53 compression than D600's iso 100 one (69/11 = 6.3), which is nonsense, of course.
You and Matse do make a good point. I should have downloaded all 3 RAW files and processed them the same way.
DeleteI don't understand how you can write a review about a camera that has not been released. Granted the 6D (on paper) sounds better than the D600. However, where is the "real world" data? I think you should have waited until the 6D was released so you could compare data from both cameras. I am a Nikon shooter and bought the D600. I didn't buy it exclusively for landscape astrophotography. In my opinion the D600 is a great camera and will meet all my needs.
ReplyDelete