tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post5703418651364597467..comments2024-03-28T00:20:39.242-07:00Comments on Into The Night Photography: New Entry-level Full-frame Cameras Lower the Cost for High ISO Night PhotographyRoyce Bairhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03361120704934058366noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post-89844915770373162282012-10-31T16:36:48.357-07:002012-10-31T16:36:48.357-07:00I don't understand how you can write a review ...I don't understand how you can write a review about a camera that has not been released. Granted the 6D (on paper) sounds better than the D600. However, where is the "real world" data? I think you should have waited until the 6D was released so you could compare data from both cameras. I am a Nikon shooter and bought the D600. I didn't buy it exclusively for landscape astrophotography. In my opinion the D600 is a great camera and will meet all my needs. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12559676311690832676noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post-61964927471354780202012-10-02T08:44:15.284-07:002012-10-02T08:44:15.284-07:00You and Matse do make a good point. I should have ...You and Matse do make a good point. I should have downloaded all 3 RAW files and processed them the same way.Royce Bairhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03361120704934058366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post-220139077386886512012-10-02T07:11:27.614-07:002012-10-02T07:11:27.614-07:00I don't think too that JPEG sizes can be used ...I don't think too that JPEG sizes can be used for accessing noise levels between cameras.<br />For example it could be that different cameras have different JPEG quality associated with the JPEG-Fine in-camera setting. As a evidence - 5D3's jpeg is "cleaner" at iso 100 with 7.53 compression than D600's iso 100 one (69/11 = 6.3), which is nonsense, of course. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post-29291166370243707722012-10-02T05:06:15.341-07:002012-10-02T05:06:15.341-07:00I don't see how you can come to any conclusion...I don't see how you can come to any conclusion about the sensor of the camera if you take only processed data (i.e. JPEG, compressed motion picture material) into consideration. There are more variables that dictate the size of a JPEG but noise.<br /><br />Also, if you look at the RAW DPR comparometer shots at ISO 6400 it becomes apparent that the D600 is better than the 5D3 (by a tiny bit) and the D800, at pixel level, appears a tiny bit worse than the D600, however the resolution of the D800 is of course higher and normalized to the image size of the D600 I expect the D800 to be slightly ahead.<br /><br />Based on this data I can't really follow your argument.Matzehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01530395853165001656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6520705626760647250.post-65354074452497176442012-10-01T23:54:45.536-07:002012-10-01T23:54:45.536-07:00I'm a bit puzzled as to why you would want to ...I'm a bit puzzled as to why you would want to do a comparison of the D600 and the 6D here. Why not just write about your experience with the D600 now and then when the 6D comes out your experience with that. <br /><br />My only real conclusion from reading your article is that you are a Canon owner and want the 6D to be better (although you don't state this anywhere).<br /><br />Incidentally, I followed your link from Ming Thein's website. I'm neither a candidate for the D600 or 6D, but I do like to read about photography (I have a D700 and a 5D2 but have pretty much given up on DSLRs). Guy Platthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10533725342297812920noreply@blogger.com