Opal Skies over Iceland by Jurgen Lobert

Opal Skies - Aurora borealis over Iceland, mid-March. One of about 400 frames in a time lapse
© Jürgen M. Lobert ~ Nikon D750 • 15mm Sigma Fisheye • f/2.8 • 8 sec • ISO 3200

Jürgen Lobert's passion for night photography began when he took a course at NESOP, taught by Lance Keimig. "[I] always had an interest in low light photography, but never knew how to do it. This course kicked it all lose and got me to invest heavily in photography as my now major hobby," says Jürgen.

Satisfaction and challenges: Jürgen finds profound peace in roaming the nights, and capturing the serenity of strange places. He is also drawn to its challenges. "[Night photography is] unorthodox, hauntingly beautiful, different and not mainstream," says Lobert.

His biggest challenge is time. "I have a daytime job and career, which prevents me from spending as much time as I'd like to spend, particularly travel."

Lighthouse Emissions - Aurora borealis over Iceland, mid-March. Distant lighthouse appears to emit the
aurora colors ~ © Jürgen M. Lobert • Nikon D4 • Nikkor 14-24mm @ 14mm • f/2.8 • 15 sec • ISO 800

Equipment, tools and software: Lobert's most valuable photography equipment for doing his night photography are his Nikon D4 (its illuminated buttons are perhaps his most favorite feature —no flashlights needed). Favorite lenses are his Nikkor 14-24mm and 24-70mm. He uses a Dincum lens shade for urban work. Apps include Sundroid, Tide Prediction and Stellarium.

Jürgen's most-bang-for-the-buck tools: a velcro strip to prevent your intervalometer from dangling, and a reflective strip on the tripod to find it in pitch black darkness. (He once searched for his tripod for half an hour in Death Valley's "Racetrack" area!)

3D Explosion - Aurora borealis over Iceland, mid-March. Clouds in the foreground, aurora in the middle
and stars in the background give this image a very three-dimensional feeling ~ © Jürgen M. Lobert
Nikon D4 • Nikkor 14-24mm @ 14mm • f/4.0 • 6 sec • ISO 2200

Jürgen Lobert, Ph.D. is primarily a scientist who spent 30 years in atmospheric chemistry to hunt down global warming and ozone depleting gases and solve problems in the manufacturing of semiconductors. To balance that nerdy side, he started fine art photography to capture places and moments in time, in unique ways. Jürgen specializes in night and daytime long exposure photography, light painting and astro-landscapes. He lives west of Boston and is an executive member of the Boston Camera Club, and the founder and organizer of the Greater Boston Night Photographers Meetup group. He has organized about 100 photo excursions and he is a lecturer, instructor and judge for regional camera clubs.

Although Jürgen is not making his living from photography, he considers himself a professional photographer, as every aspect of his photography is highly professional: equipment, approach, his teaching, lecturing and competition judging. More of Jürgen photography can be found on his website.

               Royce's 2015 NightScape Workshop Schedule

What Do The Northern Lights Actually Look Like?

Northern Lights: What your eyes see versus what the camera captures ~ © Mike Taylor

What do the Northern Lights Actually Look Like? Mike Taylor, of Taylor Photography, recently shared the following information with me. It might help you better understand how our eyes and our cameras see the night sky differently, particularly the aurora borealis, or Northern Lights. (Note: Mike reminds me that the information included below applies to areas in the Northern Hemisphere around the 50 degree latitude mark or lower. As you go above that parallel, the differences between what your eyes see and what the camera records become less noticeable.)

While observing the aurora is a truly awe-inspiring and often breathtaking experience, the images that come out of modern day DSLR cameras do not match what you witness in real life. I've photographed many colors in the fantastic Northern Lights displays I've been lucky enough to observe including green, purple, yellow, orange, red, magenta and blue. But I never REALLY know what color they are unless I'm looking at my camera's LCD screen or more importantly viewing these images on my computer. Why?

The simplistic answer is because human eyes can't see the relatively “faint” colors of the aurora at night. Our eyes have cones and rods – the cones work during the day and the rods work at night.

“Humans use two different kinds of cells in their eyes to sense light. Cone cells, concentrated in the fovea in the central area of vision, are high resolution and detect color in bright light. These are the main cells we use for vision in the daytime. Rod cells, concentrated in the periphery around the outside of the fovea, can detect much fainter light at night, but only see in black and white and shades of gray. [Aurora] only appear to us in shades of gray because the light is too faint to be sensed by our color-detecting cone cells.” – Jerry Lodriguss

Thus the human eye views the Northern Lights generally in “black & white.” DSLR camera sensors don't have this limitation. Couple that fact in with long exposure times and high ISO settings of modern cameras = the camera sensor has a much higher dynamic range of vision in the dark than we do. The same thing is true regarding the Milky Way and night photography in general. Some folks claim that they can see many colors during an aurora display and that very well may be. I have definitely seen light shades of green, red, and violet/purple but I can only speak for myself and my empirical knowledge - your mileage may vary. The farther North your viewing location, the more colors you can actually see because the aurora is stronger.

I made the [above] graphic to show what I mean. These three photographs exemplify the most impressive aurora displays I've seen. The top row of images have had the skies desaturated by color (green, yellow, red, magenta, purple, blue) to show what I saw with my eyes. A bit of green has been retained on the horizons and just a bit of the color that I remember seeing above that – red, violet, and red respectively.

FYI - I generally set the white balance on my camera to Kelvin 3450 - 3570 when shooting the features of the night sky but I will also take a few frames with it set on Auto to see what colors the camera thinks it should be capturing. Most times I end up going with the Kelvin setting, which is a little bit on the cool/blue side of the spectrum. The EXIF data for these shots are K-3450, K-3570, K-3570 respectively. I process all my photos through Lightroom 4 & Photoshop CS5 and I certainly have an “artist's view” when bringing an image to life but when it comes to these strong aurora scenes, the colors have not been saturated very much because Mother Nature did that work beautifully.

Here's Mike's description of the above three images, with links to larger views of each:

Left Side Image - Pemaquid Point Lighthouse (crazy magenta curtains):
I saw “dancing lights” in the sky, spiking straight up starting around a few hundred feet off the ground. They waved a bit like curtains but stayed in basically the same area. They seemed to be kind of a blur though, the “spikes” were not very defined. There was definitely a green hue on the horizon and a bit of red color above that but I didn't see the crazy red & magenta colors that my camera recorded. I saw what appeared to be white/grey “curtains” dancing along the black sky.

Center Image - Unity Train Tracks (blue colored spikes):
I didn't see much of anything but I set up, started shooting and immediately saw green on the horizon on my camera screen. I set the camera to shoot 30 second exposures for an hour with just a few seconds in between so that I could quickly review the scenes on the LCD screen as my camera snapped away. Within 10 minutes or so, I saw sharp spikes or columns shooting up and slowly moving across the sky. To my eye they appeared to be a light violet/purple color enough that I actually posted a status update to Facebook at 2:24 AM that said “You know the aurora is cranked up when you can see the purple spikes with your naked eye.” When the display died down, I quickly looked through my images but I didn't really know the spikes were blue until I viewed them on my computer.

Right Side Image - Small Pond Outside of Unity (incredible oval & screaming spikes):
The most impressive oval I've ever seen, a perfect arc which covered the Northern sky's horizon. The tallest and most crisp “spikes” I've witnessed, reaching all the way to the stars. Again I saw definite green around the oval at the horizon but the spikes themselves were white/grey, not the intense red that my camera captured.

The intensity of the aurora always ebbs and flows, sometimes it is quite strong and other times it is mild. If you can see a simple glow or swirling lights on the horizon and/or “spikes” shooting into the sky that look like spotlights and/or “curtains” of light – pay attention and/or be patient. The display can last just a few minutes, a half hour, or longer. Most of the intense shows I have witnessed in Maine, USA have lasted right around a half hour.

Mike Taylor operates Taylor Photography and an imaging studio out of a 19th Century farmhouse in central Maine. He's been a scenic and nature photographer for over 10 years, and a studio photographer for seven years. Beside being an artist, he's also a philosopher, musician, movie buff, and a self-proclaimed connoisseur of beverages made from malted barley and hops ("We all have our bag of rocks to carry," whips Mike.) You can fine more of Mike's images on his website, Facebook, Google+, and Pinterest. His night photography workshop schedule is on his blog.

 ~ Take our NightScape Poll ~           

Royce's 2014 Workshop, Lecture & Video Conference Schedule: NightScapeEvents.com

Featured Post: Shooting Stars eBook Review — How to Photograph the Stars and the Moon

Our Night Photography Audience

"Colors of Autumn" © David Cartier, Sr. - Yukon, Canada

 A recent poll shows that 70% of my subscribers are "Serious amateur" photographers, and that the balance (30%) are "Part-time professional" photographers. The other choices were "Occasional hobbyist" photographers, and "Professional" photographers (earning 50% or more of their income from photography). You can take the poll yourself (until October 18, 2012).

David Cartier, our featured photographer, claims to be an "Unemployed Bum", so I don't know where he'd fit if he took that survey ;-). David lives in Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. He has some of the best Northern Lights photos I've ever seen, and many of them were shot on film. A considerable number were taken with an old Russian Kiev-19 35mm SLR. David adds, "This camera , which I still use for night sky photos, NEVER freezes up or has any shutter problems in the cold, even at minus 60!! The more expensive Japanese and German cameras which I own always, or at least often, stop functioning in the deep cold."

I decided to invite the subscribers of my Your Photo Vision blog and newsletter to take this poll (and another poll about their interests) after discovering that a large percentage had interest in doing night photography. Even though that blog covers a wide variety of photo-related subjects, it appears that night photography is of considerable interest to my subscribers (80% wanted to learn and improve on their night photography techniques). Of course, we all wonder about the accuracy of polls, because most of us like to hear the results of a poll, but few of want to participate in taking the poll!

New Poll: What areas of night photography interest you the most? (Multiple answers are allowed.) This poll takes about 40 seconds, and will help drive the direction of my future posts. You can view the results of the poll immediately, and come back later for an update until October 19, 2012.